From the Whole? From the Parts?

From the Whole? From the Parts?
View and idea of the one
Natural Acquisition by Yappy

When the line is slow, it takes very long time when information on big data is downloaded
by the Internet.
We can see it little by little in the place, when the photograph is downloaded.

In this page, there is a story when not the machine such as the Internet and computers
but people obtain information.

It takes very a lot of time to obtain big information when information can be gotten only
little by little.

How do you understand the whole when such big information is gotten?

As for how to get the information, two methods are greatly devised.

The first is the method of clearly gradually obtaining information from a state
hazy as the entire information is caught.
This is so-called the method of "view from the whole".

The second is the method of clearly neatly getting sequentially information
from the first part of the entire information.
This is so-called the method of "view from the parts".
I am an engineer of the science course, and I have been studying almost by this method,
and I have been working up to now.

Then, two kinds of ways that get information are seen in the shape by eyes of
image this time.

You know the photograph of the digital camera to be a group of a lot of points.

"Mega-pixel" is a meaning of one million pixels.

For instance, it is assumed that there is a beautiful photograph composed of
150,000 points.

However, because there are terribly a lot of numbers, we try to obtain
150,000 pieces little by little and to see.

Method of view from the whole. When seeing evenly while catching the whole...	Volume of information	Method of view from the parts When you sequentially pick up the point from a left upper end...
	Whole 0.03% (50 pixels)
Such feeling in case of 50 points. Do you understand what's this? Because this has grown dim, I do not understand anything.		In 50 points from the edge, it is very small and we don't understand at all.

	Whole 0.2% (300 pixels)
When 300 points are gotten, it becomes such feeling. Even if I have imagination work, I don't understand what's this well.		Nothing is understood in 300 points from the edge still at all.

	Whole 1% (1,500 pixels)
A golden object has come into view to the center somehow when 1,500 points are gotten.		Nothing is understood in 1,500 points from the edge still either.

	Whole 4 % (6,000 pixels)
The object like a golden building has come into view dimly when 6,000 points are gotten.		Anything is not seen even if 6,000 points are gotten when seeing from the edge.

	Whole 10 % (15,000 pixels)
When 15,000 points, the volume of information of 10%, are gotten from the whole, we roughly understand it is Kinkakuji temple.		Something small has faintly come into view to us when 15,000 points of 10% are gotten from the edge. However, the whole is not seen.

	Whole 20 % (30,000 pixels)
When 30,000 points, 20%, are gotten from the whole, we understand the whole content of Kinkakuji temple almost completely. The pine in this side and the garden are beautiful.		A part of a golden building has come into view to us when 30000 points of 20% are gotten from the edge. However, we have not understood the whole yet.

Whole information ( 150,000 pixels)		Whole information ( 150,000 pixels)
This is a photograph when all of the 150,000 points are finally gotten. It is hardly different from the case to get 30,000 points, 20%, from the whole, isn't it? Roughly, it has been understood even to get 10% from the whole by 15,000 points. The whole was not seen in 10% at all when getting it from the edge, isn't it?

What is Natural Acquisition?

I'm looking back on me... in fact, I had studied English at the junior high school, the high
school, and the university also... while replacing the meaning of an individual word
with Japanese, and while seriously assembling English parts from the edge,
among the whole English.

It proceeds to the next step after I completely understand anyone.

After all, My English language skill is about 6,000 points, 4% of the whole still,
though I have studied at the school.
I had studied without understanding the whole of English well.

I thought that I talked after being able to have completed the assembly of sentences.

However, I couldn't have the spoken courage, because my English was not completely yet.

There is a person near by myself who is practicing little by little getting
information catching the whole, differing from the method of studying
such an English language that I practiced.
It is a baby.

The baby is talking about 50-300 levels enough picking up information
little by little while hearing the whole in the environment of the mother
tongue heard in surroundings.

If a complete language assumes the photograph of 150,000 information,
"the whole 150,000" is far.
However, we manage to talk even at 1,500 levels (only 1%) gotten while
catching the whole.

Are infants about 6,000 levels, and are school children about 15,000 levels?
Even if they do not understand like the adult, they are not inconvenient
in communications at all with the adult at this level.

This is exactly the "Natural Acquisition".

I naturally acquire Japanese from baby's time and have grown up.
However, I have studied English from the parts with a hard time.
Did I fail English language that I had been studied hard, without seeing the whole
at the level of 10% seen from the parts?

I think that I'm going to enjoy the diversity of languages while catching the
whole like the baby now.

Originally, I am a type that cannot leave an unknown thing just as it is, and I am logical
type in the typical science course.

Therefore, I was not able to advance to next step if I had not understood everything.
Moreover, I was not able to talk by English because I did not completely understand an
individual word.

I don't say on this page that "Method of view from the whole" is always excellent.

I want you to understand that there were two kinds of "View and idea" like this,
and I wrote this page.

"Natural acquisition caught from the whole" turns in respect of the language as the baby
is practicing it.

However, for instance, I think that the method of starting from the part is suitable for
study of mathematics. In a word, it is a way of proceeding to the next step after it is
understood one.

Moreover, I had always looked at only the parts up to now when looking back on my work.

However, I think that I need the idea of view from the whole, too.

Now, I think that it is important that the human have flexibly various ideas.