indigo window 画面上背景


2008 Constructors' Championship Points (Final) (Round 1 - 18)

Pos Team Total
1   Scuderia Ferrari
  Marlboro
172 1
8
-
10
1
-
18
1
2
18
1
2
16
1
3
6
3
9
4
5
-
18
1
2
5
4
13
9
3
6
6
3
17
10
1
-
10
1
18
3
6
9
0
13
15
8
3
7
14
2
3
16
1
3
2   Vodafone
  McLaren Mercedes
151 14
1
5
10
3
5
4
5
13
6
3
-
8
2
12
11
1
8
0
9
-
5
4
10
14
1
5
14
1
5
14
1
5
13
2
4
6
3
10
10
2
7
6
3
10
0
12
-
10
1
-
6
5
7
3   BMW Sauber
  F1 Team
135 8
2
-
11
2
6
11
3
4
5
4
9
9
4
5
8
2
14
18
1
2
4
5
13
8
2
-
7
4
7
1
8
10
6
3
9
11
2
6
10
3
5
3
6
11
8
2
9
7
5
6
0
10
11
4   ING Renault
  F1 Team
80 5
4
-
1
8
11
0
10
-
-
-
-
3
6
15
0
10
-
-
-
-
3
7
8
3
6
-
8
2
11
8
4
6
0
11
-
5
4
-
5
4
10
10
1
-
15
1
4
6
4
8
8
2
-
5   Panasonic
  Toyota Racing
56 -
-
-
5
4
-
3
6
9
1
8
11
0
10
13
0
12
13
8
4
6
6
3
11
2
7
12
0
9
-
10
2
7
6
5
7
0
9
16
0
11
13
5
4
-
4
5
-
2
7
-
4
6
8
6   Scuderia
  Toro Rosso
39 2
7
-
-
-
-
0
15
-
-
-
-
0
17
-
4
5
-
1
8
13
0
12
17
0
11
-
1
8
12
0
18
-
3
6
10
6
5
7
10
1
18
4
5
12
3
6
10
0
9
13
5
4
14
7   Red Bull Racing 29 -
-
-
2
7
9
2
7
18
4
5
12
2
7
9
5
4
-
6
3
12
3
6
9
0
10
-
0
13
-
0
9
11
0
12
17
1
8
11
1
8
16
2
7
-
1
8
-
0
10
14
0
9
-
8   AT&T Williams 26 9
3
6
0
14
17
1
8
14
2
7
-
1
8
-
2
7
-
0
10
-
0
15
16
1
8
9
0
10
14
0
13
14
1
8
15
0
12
14
0
12
14
9
2
8
0
11
15
0
12
15
0
12
17
9   Honda Racing
  F1 Team
14 -
-
-
0
10
13
0
11
-
3
6
-
0
11
14
3
6
11
2
7
11
0
14
-
6
3
-
0
17
-
0
12
16
0
13
16
0
15
-
0
15
17
0
9
-
0
13
14
0
11
16
0
13
15
10   Force India
  F1 Team
0 -
-
-
0
12
-
0
12
19
0
10
-
0
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
18
19
-
-
-
0
15
16
0
15
-
0
14
-
0
13
17
0
19
-
0
14
-
-
-
-
0
17
-
0
16
18
11   Super Aguri
  F1 Team
0 -
-
-
0
15
16
0
16
17
0
13
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Key   Numbers in bold type (i.e. - 0) = Points scored in Grand Prix
  Numbers in normal type (i.e. - 7) = Position in Grand Prix
Note:
The Formula One World Championship Sporting Regulations provide that if two or more constructors or drivers have the same number of points (including 0 points), their positions in the Championship are fixed according to the quality of their places. Under this system one first place is better than any number of second places, one second place is better than any number of third places, and so on.



[back]